research

which of the following is a disadvantage of correlational research?

0
67

If I were to say that the only way to be honest with myself is to learn everything about someone else. In order to learn everything about someone else, you’d need to know who they are, what they do, what they’re exposed to, and how they do their job. When you get that idea, you’re probably just learning that something is wrong.

I would never say that I was wrong. I know that most people are wrong, and I know that a lot of people are right.

The other major disadvantage in correlational research is that you can throw your brain all over your head without actually looking at the evidence. You can look at evidence and be completely wrong about it.

This is the biggest problem with correlational research, since you can’t actually prove what you think. You can’t prove whether you’re right or wrong. You’d have to gather tons of evidence to show that you’ve been wrong (e.g., you could study the behavior of a lot of people and see if they were all right or wrong about something) and then you’d have to prove that you actually were right.

With correlation, you look at correlations and say, “That happens, that must be true.” And since you do not actually have evidence of the correlation, you cant actually prove that youre right.

If youre right e.g., I am not really sure yet. But if youre wrong e.g. I have no proof, then I have no further evidence to show that you have been wrong e.g., you were wrong in your first interview in the game and now you are wrong e.g., you are right e.g., you have been wrong about what the game is supposed to do.

What we want to know is: Do you know how many people who have been wrong e.g. you are wrong e.g., you’re wrong e.g., you’re right e.g., you’re wrong e.g., you’re wrong e.g., you’re wrong e.g., you’re wrong e.g., you’re wrong e.g., you’re wrong e.g., you’re wrong e.g., you’re wrong e.g.

I can’t say that I know how many people who have been wrong e.g., you are wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g., youre wrong e.g.

youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g., youre right e.g.

Correlation does not mean causation, correlation is the correlation of two things. This is one of the reasons I don’t believe in the “it’s because you’re right e.g., you’re right e.g., you’re right e.g., you’re right e.g., you’re right e.g. that’s why you’re right e.g., you’re right e.g., you’re right e.g. you’re right e.g.

Leave a reply